Posted by: nativeiowan | March 29, 2011

Can you say… huge slush fund?

This in today’s Solomon Star… If you look at the proposed bulleted lines toward the bottom you will hear the rush that is taking place for cronies trying to get a piece of the pie…

Building cash reserves

WEDNESDAY, 30 MARCH 2011 04:42
Gordon Darcy Lilo

MINISTER for Finance, Gordon Darcy Lilo said the 2011 budget would put the Government in a better position to deliver its services to the citizens of this country.

Mr Lilo told media this after he delivered the $2 billion budget speech in front of the 48 members of Parliament yesterday.

Two members were not present after they passed away last year and by elections for their constituencies namely Baegu Asifola and Shortlands Islands commence today.

This year’s budget is an increase of about $165 million from the 2010 budget.

Lilo said this was the first genuinely fully funded budget, funded entirely from domestically sourced revenue and donor budget support.

“It requires no borrowing and it builds our cash reserves,” he said.

“It is a forward looking and sustainable budget in that it will deliver a surplus of $24 million to allow the Government to further build its cash reserves.

“It is a responsible budget in that it provides $53 million to cover the potential for urgent and unforeseen needs,” Mr Lilo said.

He said the theme for the budget was “cutting wastages and improving on quality spending” so that “we can deliver effectively for the services to our people and lay the foundation for Solomon Islands to grow.”

In the budget, the Government has commenced the implementation of a number of its key priorities.

In the budget:

  • $126.7 million additional funding to promote reconciliation and undertake critical social reforms.
  • $37.6 million additional funding to strengthen national security and enhance our relationship with key nations around the world.
  • $92.5 million additional funding to restore run down and poorly maintained infrastructure and develop new infrastructure.
  • $210.2 million additional funding for the development of the country’s economic base.
  • $71.5 million additional funding to reform and enhance the public sector.
Posted by: nativeiowan | March 29, 2011

Miss’n the fish’n

This is where I was headed…

http://www.zipolohabu.com.sb/

Posted by: nativeiowan | March 29, 2011

Bummer City

Cancelled a trip out west this morning. Business came up that forced me to not meet Dok C at Lola.

Were heading off shore to chase marlin and then planning to fly-fish the flats.

Bummer city…

Posted by: nativeiowan | March 29, 2011

who ever controls the oil…

… makes the deals…

Qatar has recognised Libya’s rebel council as the legitimate representatives of the Libyan people, a day after the group announced an oil contract with the Gulf state.

The move on Monday makes Qatar only the second country to formally recognise the Libyan rebel council, but has been backed by the Gulf Co-operation Council (GCC).

A statement from Abdulrahman al-Attiyah, the outgoing GCC secretary general, said Qatar’s “recognition of the transitional council as the only legitimate representative of the Libyan people comes in line with the decisions of the GCC”.

“The Libyan system has lost its legitimacy,” said al-Attiyahi.

Qatar also has warplanes taking part in UN- and Arab League-backed air raids aimed at imposing a no-fly zone over Libya, and has urged Gaddafi to quit to avoid more bloodshed.

France previously recognised the rebel council as the legitimate representative of Libya, the first and so far only Western power to do so.

Libyan state television condemned Qatar’s recognition of the rebel council, saying the move amounted to “blatant interference” in Libyan affairs.

Oil contract reported

Qatar’s recognition of the rebel council comes just a day after a senior rebel official said that Qatar Petroleum had agreed to market crude oil produced from east Libyan oil fields no longer under the control of Muammar Gaddafi, the Libyan leader.

“Our next shipment will be in less than a week,” he said, speaking from the rebel-held city of Benghazi.”We contacted the oil company of Qatar and thankfully they agreed to take all the oil that we wish to export and market this oil for us,” said Ali Tarhouni, a rebel official in charge of economic, financial and oil matters.

Qatar’s state-owned oil company has not confirmed the deal.

Manouchehr Takin, from the Centre of Global Energy Studies, told Al Jazeera that the deal, if confirmed, would be “a landmine, legally speaking”.

“Is this council representing the Libyan people? Only two countries have accepted that. Whether we like it or not, the Tripoli government, by the United Nations, is [still] the legitimate and sovereign government,” he said.

“There is also no mechanism for this – there’s no central bank [for the rebels], there’s no ministry of finance … I think it’s a very risky commercial venture for any company to come and buy this oil.

“And if the Tripoli government remains in power they will probably take legal action over the sale of this oil.”

Libya produced about 1.6 million barrels of oil per day before the crisis, or almost 2 per cent of world output.

Most of the oil is in the east, but sanctions and the lack of a marketing operation have stopped the rebels selling it abroad.

Libya relies heavily on oil exports, which pay the state salaries on which most families depend.

Sanctions struggle

Tarhouni said output from the Libyan oil fields controlled by rebels is running at about 100,000 to 130,000 barrels per day, which could be increased to 300,000.

The Reuters news agency reported officials at eastern oil firm Agoco as saying that the company was pumping most of the oil produced in the east to the terminal in Tobruk in the far east of the country.

Output at its fields, including Nafoora, Sarir and Misla in the Sirte Basin, fell in recent weeks as an absence of shipments since early March led to a build-up of stocks at Tobruk.

Agoco had said it aimed to begin marketing its oil abroad before ceding the plan to the rebel national council.

The plan seemed to have hit a stumbling block when Agoco was named along with 13 other Libyan companies targeted by US sanctions designed to cut off funding to Gaddafi.

Tarhouni, a US-based academic and exile opposition figure, was designated last week by the Benghazi-based national council to steer its financial and oil policy.

Posted by: nativeiowan | March 29, 2011

the war of words…

But well worth a read…

NO FLY ZONE: CLOUDING WORDS OF WAR

The West has used euphemism to deny a state of war against Gaddafi under the guise of a humanitarian mission.

Phantasms from the 1990s are upon us: no-fly zones; the rhetoric of humanitarian war in Washington, Europe and the UN; guarantees that no US ground troops will be deployed; an air war which alone cannot decisively affect earthbound events.

President Obama swung for ringing tones in his statement on Libya, condemning idleness in the face of merciless tyrants who brutally assault innocents.

In the legal codes through which the international community acknowledges so untoward a happening as war, the UN resolved to protect civilians and create a cordon sanitaire around the blighted country.

But it was all a faraway echo from the Yugoslav heyday of believing people could be bombed for humanitarian effect.

The language of liberal war may still flow as easily in the West as Libya’s sweet crude, but even the true believers are running on fumes on this one.

Few critics have even bothered to point out the obvious selectivity. Obama meant no idling before this particular tyrant, while the UN Security Council offered the beatific state of protected innocence to some Libyans only, not to Syrians, Yemenis, Palestinians or Bahrainis, much less those suffering in the Ivory Coast, Zimbabwe or elsewhere.

Nonetheless the idea of liberal war, of the use of force for humanitarian objectives, continues to cloud opinion and profoundly informs the official terms of debate, in international forums and especially in Western Europe. It also shapes the character of coalition operations over Libya.

Denying war, the art of euphemisms

Liberal war is so useful, particularly to ‘good Europeans’, because it denies it is war. It is a no-fly zone protecting human rights!

While quite obviously joining the Libyan rebels in their war on the regime, coalition commanders are forced to pretend otherwise. They regularly and politely inform Gaddafi’s forces where they need to regroup to avoid being destroyed in the name of universal values.

In essence, and without ever saying so, the message to Gaddafi is that he must stop defending himself from those who would overthrow him. Why, we might ask, is it not possible to speak more plainly, at least to ourselves? Why must war be confronted with liberal euphemisms?

At the core of liberal war is a contradiction between big rhetoric – humanity, innocence, evil – and limited liability, signalled by ‘no ground troops’ and the pathetic legions of UN peacekeepers.

In wars primarily justified on altruistic grounds, the elected leaders of the Western democracies wisely, if conveniently, spare the blood if not the dollars of their own citizens.

The chosen weapon is air power and the cost is strategic incoherence. Absent a terrestrial policy, air forces are left to blow things up, surveil the results, and fly about. Other things being equal, the likely outcome is stalemate.

Most pernicious is the way liberal war frames understanding of conflicts. It performs a sleight of hand that can only be admired.

A dramatic play

There is space for two main actors, the humane intervener (typically the international community led by the West) and the barbaric perpetrator (a changing and selective cast of leaders, regimes and ethnic groups).

As if by magic, real countries and peoples, with interwoven histories, become characters in a morality play, essential types who behave according to innate characteristics.

The drama comes in various versions, and by no means does the West always come out well in the end. But the terms of thought are set in riveting fashion: interest and ideals, tragedy and politics, bureaucratic inaction and charisma.

Historical memory is a casualty so instantaneous no one notices. The US fought its first war in what is now Libya, against the Barbary pirates, also justified by humanitarian concerns undergirded with commercial interest.

Blinded by tales of well-intentioned Westerners and violent natives again and again, it becomes impossible to see the shared, interconnected histories that led to the current conflict, and within which Libyans, Westerners and others are situated.

Libya was granted independence as a kingdom only sixty years ago, with the US and UK as patrons, supplying cash and arms in exchange for oil and stability.

As elsewhere, then and now, this combination generated popular resentment. It provided the ground for political alternatives, which Gaddafi seized.

History’s funhouse

He may be a character from history’s funhouse, sent to remind us that contingency’s reign is great, but his origins are to be found in the conjoined histories of the West and the rest.

More recently, Gaddafi’s border police and coast guard, trained and assisted by the EU, have been greatly valued by the ‘good Europeans’ for helping keep out the Africans.

Liberal war’s last service is to locate the source of violence in the natives, on the backward peoples of the non-European world, not on the Westerners who exploit, invade, occupy and bomb.

If we go by official rhetoric, the problem in Iraq and Afghanistan apparently has to do with religious and ethnic prejudice among the peoples there, who irrationally keep killing one another as well as Western soldiers kindly sent to modernise them.

The great cost of liberal war is clarity. The West now risks creating a situation where it neither allows nor enables the rebels to overthrow Gaddafi, nor will it do so itself.

As in Bosnia and Kosovo, to supply arms or allow in Arab volunteers, would violate the supposed neutrality of humanitarian intervention. Gaddafi can turn to death squads and snipers to carry on his fight.

War is not a morality tale, but a violent mutual embrace. Serious thinking begins with acceptance that we in the West are now combatants, and ethical responsibility requires seeing beyond the seductions of liberalism.

Tarak Barkawi is Senior Lecturer, Centre of International Studies, University of Cambridge. He specialises in the study of war, armed forces and society with a focus on conflict between the West and the global South in historical and contemporary perspective. He is author of Globalization and War, as well as many scholarly articles.

Posted by: nativeiowan | March 29, 2011

good newz

Who out there watches or reads Al Jazeera?

Well worth a test ride…

http://english.aljazeera.net/

Posted by: nativeiowan | March 28, 2011

It’ll all be over soon…

And I feel so much better to know:

SI supports UN resolution on Libya
MONDAY, 28 MARCH 2011 04:02

The Solomon Islands Government yesterday joined the International Community to support the United Nations (UN) Security Council Resolution 1973 on the crisis in Libya.

Minister of Foreign Affairs and External Trade Peter Shanel Agovaka made the announcement at a media conference in Honiara yesterday in view of escalating violence that killed innocent civilians in Libya.

“Solomon Islands will always support any resolution that aims to protect human rights and in this situation Resolution 1973 is fully supported,” Mr Agovaka said.

He said in the past few weeks, the world has witnessed widespread demonstrations across the Middle East including Libya.

“One thing that these protests have clearly demonstrated is that governments cannot deny the will of the people that calls for recognition of their wellbeing and human rights.”
Minister Agovaka said Solomon Islands hopes that in carrying out Resolution 1973, the International Community will be able to address the growing crisis in Libya.

Posted by: nativeiowan | March 27, 2011

last one for a waning weekend…

02 How To Be Righteous

Posted by: nativeiowan | March 27, 2011

kidz, dawgz, tube-steakz and pool

Pretty much sums up the weekend.

Had Angelo and Mendozza all weekend. 5 and 8 respectively.

From XBox to bikes and scooters to the pool to haircuts with Connie on Saturday morn…

These two guys do move fast. I call them “my pups”. And they respond as such. I recall my old buddy, W.E.’s, comment when my kids were young… “it’s more fun to have fun…” And we do.

The living room is base-camp. The bed room is a decent mess too. My bed has not been slept in. We spent most the time somewhere in the living room either playing video games I have no clue about or watching something on TV or playing cards or board games.

Grandma has been in Gizo.

Connie just took Angelo home. I’m cooking up a mess of ginger noodles.

I enjoy watching the children grow up from a grandparent’s point of view. The stresses of life that we lived under when our kids were small are all changed. Perhaps life is easier, perhaps not, but the point of view as a happy-granny is much different from a parent, happy or not.

So the dawgs have had their baths. The kids have worn themselves out. Got loads of work to think about tomorrow. Mendozza crashed out ages ago. The dogs are quiet.

Life is good.

end the weekend muzik…

10 sweet jane

Posted by: nativeiowan | March 27, 2011

interesting, very interesting….

Hadron Collider ‘could act as telephone for talking to the past’

Boffins in America say that the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), most puissant matter-rending machine ever assembled by humanity, may also turn out to be the first time-machine ever built. According to the physicists’ calculations, instruments at the mighty particle-smasher may soon detect signs of “singlets” which it has not yet generated, sent back from their creation in the future.

“Our theory is a long shot,” admits physics prof Tom Weiler, “but it doesn’t violate any laws of physics or experimental constraints.”

According to calculations by Weiler and his colleague Chui Man Ho, if the LHC manages to generate the long-theorised but never actually seen Higgs Boson (aka “the god particle” – confirmation of its existence was a major reason for the Collider’s construction) it should also create another mysterious particle dubbed the “Higgs singlet”*. These singlets, according to Weiler and Ho, might be able to move in a fifth dimension transverse to our existing four-dimensional continuum – thus they could pop out of our universe and subsequently re-enter it elsewhere in time.

This thinking relies on the idea that the 4-D continuum we can perceive exists within a 10- or 11-dimensional universe, rather as a flat two-dimensional membrane could float suspended in normal three-d space. Versions of the so-called “M-theory” in physics hold that this is the case, but that almost all kinds of forces, waves, particles etc are stuck to the four-dimensional membrane, aka the “brane” for short.

Higgs singlets and possibly certain other things might be exceptions to the general rule, not stuck to the brane like almost everything else. Weiler and Ho are already quite well known for suggesting back in 2007 that a type of special neutrino could do this. Thus, if their theories are correct, the LHC might soon detect Higgs singlets popping back onto the branebefore the collision which generated them.

Weiler insists that proper speculo-fiction time travel, faster-than-light transport etc still isn’t on as only ultra-bizarro sub-subatomic particles can perform these extradimensional feats. However he does raise the possibilities of communication using such particles.

“Because time travel is limited to these special particles, it is not possible for a man to travel back in time and murder one of his parents before he himself is born, for example,” says the prof. “However, if scientists could control the production of Higgs singlets, they might be able to send messages to the past or future.”

The LHC, then, might function as a transmitter for communicating across time – or, it would seem, as a possible means of sending messages across the three-dimensional universe faster than light can travel through it.

To the dull workaday minds here on the Reg boffinry desk, this would still seem to present the same paradoxes as conventional time travel. In years to come one might employ the Collider or some similar future singlet-transmitter branephone to call up somebody in the past and persuade them to murder your dad or similar – meaning that you could never have made the call in the first place. But we would candidly admit that our grasp on the notion is tenuous at best.

In the idea’s defence, Weiler and Ho’s multidimensional version of M-theory is apparently one of the few pictures of the universe which can explain all the types of particle and force which we know to exist. Those with the knowledge to understand it can find the two physicists’ ideas on brane-bouncing singlet time travel laid out here on arXiv. We recommend some kind of reinforced hat to prevent head explosion.

Those who would like a simpler outline may care to read this handy press release from Weiler and Ho’s university, Vanderbilt. ®

Posted by: nativeiowan | March 27, 2011

interesting enough…

Researchers from Leicester and Wales have shed new light on the origins of bluestones at Stonehenge- long believed to have come from ‘sacred hills’ in Wales.

Geologists from the National Museum Wales, University of Leicester and Aberystwyth University, have uncovered new evidence of its origins – which brings into question how the rocks were brought to the Salisbury Plain.

One type of bluestone at Stonehenge, the so-called ‘spotted dolerite’, was convincingly traced to the Mynydd Preseli area in north Pembrokeshire in the early 1920s. However, the sources of the other bluestones – chiefly rhyolites (a type of rock) and the rare sandstones remained, until recently, unknown.

Now the team of geologists have further identified the sources of one of the rhyolite types, which also provides the opportunity for new thoughts on how the stones might have been transported to the Stonehenge area.

Their findings are published in the March 2011 edition of the Journal of Archaeological Science.

Dr Richard Bevins, Keeper of Geology at Amgueddfa Cymru, in partnership with Dr Rob Ixer, University of Leicester and Dr Nick Pearce of Aberystwyth University, have been working on the rhyolite component of the bluestones, which leads them to believe it is of Welsh origin.

Through standard petrographical techniques combined with sophisticated chemical analysis of samples from Stonehenge and north Pembrokeshire using laser ablation induction coupled mass spectrometry at Aberystwyth University, they have matched one particular rhyolite to an area north of the Mynydd Preseli range, in the vicinity of Pont Saeson.

The Bluestones are a distinctive set of stones that form the inner circle and inner horseshoe of Stonehenge. Much of the archaeology in recent years has been based upon the assumption that Neolithic Age man had a reason for transporting bluestones all the way from west Wales to Stonehenge and the technical capacity to do it.

Dr Ixer, who has been attached to the University of Leicester Department of Geology for two decades, said:  “For almost 100 years the origins of the bluestones and how they got to Salisbury Plain from Southwest Wales has been matter of great debate but now due to a combination of expertise, abundant material and new techniques it is becoming possible to finally answer those questions.

“From the 8,000 samples of rock available, the exciting part was to match the Stonehenge rocks with rocks in the field in order to find their geographical source –  this was initially done microscopically. However this is difficult as rocks from every outcrop have to be described and matched and that takes detailed long term knowledge- Dr Richard Bevins from National Museum Wales has 30 years experience of sampling and collecting just these rocks in southwest Wales and once the very unusual mineralogy of some of the debitage was recognised microscopically he was able to identify the source of a major group of volcanics to Pont Season north of the Preseli Hills.

“The important and quite unexpected result based on microscopical work needed to be confirmed and this has been done recently based on very detailed mineralogical analysis with Dr Nick Pearce from the University of Aberystwyth.

“The first result was the recognition that the huge sandstone Altar stone does not come from Milford Haven but from somewhere between West Wales and Herefordshire and has nothing to do with the Preseli Hills. This calls into question the proposed transport route for the Stonehenge bluestones.

“The second unexpected result was that much of the volcanic and sandstone Stonehenge debris does not match any standing stones (so far only 2 stones out of thousands from the debris match)- it may be the debris is all that is left of lost standing stones- it is difficult to see what else it could be.

“The third is that the geographical origins for many of the Stonehenge rocks are not from impressive outcrops high on the hilltops but in less obvious places, some deep in valleys.”

Dr Ixer said that work already undertaken and more in progress suggests that, unlike the belief of the last 80 years, namely that all of the Stonehenge bluestones were from taken from the top of ‘sacred’ Preseli hills and moved southwards to the Bristol Channel and then onto Stonehenge, most or all of the volcanic and sandstone standing stones and much of the debris at Stonehenge comes from rocks in the low-lying ground to the north and northwest of the Preseli Hills and, if, they were moved by man, then they travelled initially in the Irish sea before heading south and east.

“But as ever Stonehenge asks more questions than it answers. These Stonehenge surprises will continue for a few years to come and once again the history of Stonehenge will have to be re-written.”

Posted by: nativeiowan | March 27, 2011

Reporting from Des Moines—

Likely Republican presidential candidate Newt Gingrich conceded Saturday that he made conflicting statements about U.S. involvement in Libya, but he blamed them on contradictions in President Obama’s policy.

The former House speaker called for a no-fly zone early this month after Obama said that Moammar Kadafi “must leave.” Last week, Gingrich backtracked, saying he would not have intervened using U.S. and European forces.

Addressing an audience of conservative activists, Gingrich explained that when he advocated the no-fly zone, he was merely “trying to follow Obama” and did not favor intervention. But once Obama said the Libyan dictator should go, Gingrich said, “he pitted the prestige and power of the United States against a dictator who’s been anti-American for over 40 years.”

Gingrich joined other potential GOP contenders at a daylong conference in Iowa, the first state in the presidential nomination process.

Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.), who is moving closer to a presidential run, gave Libya a lightning-fast fly-by in a speech devoted largely to “tea party” themes of spending and taxes.

Noting that Obama had just engaged U.S. military forces in a third conflict, she quipped, “Talk about March Madness,” a reference to the NCAA college basketball tournament. “Can anybody say Jimmy Carter?”

Later, in a brief interview, Bachmann said she would not have intervened in Libya “primarily because we don’t know who the opposition forces are.” The three-term congresswoman, a member of the House Intelligence Committee, said the government “didn’t have enough intelligence to know the outcome of what U.S. intervention would take. So, we need to have an endgame before you can go.”

Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour, another likely 2012 Republican contender, confined his remarks to domestic issues and never mentioned Libya. In a brief interview, he blamed a strict time limit for the omission.

Barbour said that before commenting further he wanted to see what Obama had to say in his speech to the nation Monday night. But Barbour said that “if we’re going to commit our resources, our people, particularly, we need to lead, we need to decide; we don’t need to dither while we’re waiting for the Arab League to tell us what to do. We need to be very careful about nation-building in Libya or anywhere else.”

Gingrich has been one of the few potential Republican candidates willing to say what he would do about Libya if he were president, and the backlash against his comments may suggest why party rivals have been more cautious.

“When the president decides to take the country to war,” Gingrich said, “it’s a serious and pressing national dialogue and it ought to be discussed as a public policy issue.” He declined to second-guess others for not speaking out.

In his remarks to the Des Moines conference, organized by Iowa Republican Rep. Steve King, Gingrich called for the use of U.S.-trained and -equipped Arab troops from Egypt, Morocco, Jordan and Iraq as ground advisors to the rebels, and for “using all of Western air power as decisively as possible.”

To whistles and cheers from the audience, Gingrich ridiculed what he portrayed as Obama’s uncertain leadership in the crisis.

“We need a commander in chief with the courage to tell the truth, not a spectator in chief who is confused about whether his job is kicking a soccer ball or leading the United States,” he said.

Most of the Republican contenders, including Gingrich, have criticized Obama for being slow to consult with Congress about the U.S.-led enforcement of a no-fly zone.

“To say to us Americans he’s relying on a collection of dictators called the Arab League and a corrupt institution called the United Nations — and by the way, he didn’t quite get around to consulting the U.S. Congress — that is a fundamentally false model of American government,” Gingrich said to applause.

He told reporters that he had consistently favored U.S. aid to the anti-Kadafi rebels, without the use of American forces.

“If the Western alliance wants to get rid of Kadafi, the fact is they’ll get rid of Kadafi. It’s just a question of how fast they want to do it, whether or not that’s their goal. I mean, I can’t tell what their goal is,” Gingrich said.

Posted by: nativeiowan | March 24, 2011

more island politics, fun n gamz…

Conspiracy move against Abana

Steve Abana

ONE prominent member of the Opposition Group had secretly planned the move to remove its leader, Steve Abana.

A well placed source told The Solomon Star yesterday it was evident the member wanted to take the leadership since day one when Abana was appointed as leader of Opposition.

The name of the member could not be revealed for confidential purposes.

Our source said the member conspire with the member for East Honiara, Douglas Ete to use the media to remove Abana.

In the media statement, Ete had called on Abana to step down citing a need to revive the Opposition group under a new Leader on Monday.

Mr Ete said that it is important for the Opposition group to perform its watchdog role effectively to ensure an effective government.

Our source said Abana decided to resign by himself because his reputation was spoilt in the media.

However, our source said most of the members in the Opposition Group did not agreed with the move to remove Abana.

Mr Abana was instrumental in an early attempt to topple the Danny Philip led government over what he described as “questionable dealings by certain individuals in government.”

Mr Abana, now in his second term as MP, contested for the Prime Minister’s post in early December, loosing narrowly to Prime Minister Danny Philip.

He said there was an understanding reached within the group that if the Opposition bid to oust the Government was successful he would not be vying for Prime Ministership and even if it was unsuccessful he would still relinquish leadership.

“It’s common sense that if I am still remain the leader and we successful to take over the government, then our group will need to choose someone,” he said.

“Therefore we have reached an understanding to choose someone now so that he can lead us on wards.

“It’s not something to make a big issue out of it as we can sorted out internally as a group,” Abana said.

However, Opposition Press Secretary, Deli Oso said she’s not aware of anything like this.

She said Abana decided by himself to resign since January after five MPs from the Government joined the Opposition.
“Abana said that if Opposition bid to oust the Government was successful he would not be vying for Prime Ministership and even if it was unsuccessful he would still relinquish leadership,” Ms Oso said.

“The problem is Opposition don’t have a convenient time to hold elections because the members are busy with their constituencies matters.

“Now Parliament was about to start, the members can come together to elect a new leader,” she said.
Attempts to talk to Mr Ete was unsuccessful

 

Posted by: nativeiowan | March 24, 2011

the end of the world as we know it…

Central market used as brothel

The Honiara central market is being used as a brothel at night.

THE Honiara Central Market is being used as a brothel where people are allegedly using the premises to perform sexual activities at night.

This was raised by vendors at the market who used to look after their produces over night at the market.

In a letter to the Solomon Star a concerned parent Francis Samora whose daughter was a regular vendor at the market claim the city’s main market had turned into a brothel where night goers regularly use the premises to have sex.

Mr Samora said his daughter told him that people who used to perform their sexual activities there allegedly went to the extent of also doing it in front of the market vendors.

“Some of them just don’t care where they do it and they just do it anywhere even in front of men, women and children.

“This is embarrassing and because of our diverse culture these people should be ashamed of themselves,” Mr Samora said in a letter to the Solomon Star.

He said the illegal sexual activities at the market pose a serious question to the Honiara City Council as to who is responsible for providing security at the market at night.

Mr Samora alleged that some security guards at the market were also involved in the sexual activities.

“This is very serious and I’m appealing to the City Council to investigate the matter because I believe security guards are paid to look after the market area.

“Therefore, why haven’t they act on such immoral acts unless they themselves are involved,” Mr Samora said.

Mr Samora said the Central Market should be respected as the common place where people come to sell their vegetables to consumers.

“I think the market is beginning to lose its real meaning,” he said.

The city council’s supervising clerk Charles Kelly said the city mayor Israel Maeoli had a long executive meeting yesterday so he would be commenting on the issue today.

 

Posted by: nativeiowan | March 24, 2011

Sum muzik for friday morn…

18 Driftwood At Sea

Posted by: nativeiowan | March 24, 2011

A few more days…

And I get to head west. I get to go out in small boats in the big ocean and have fun. I get to wear my arm out casting that dern fly on the end of that dern little line. I get to spend a couple nights under a sago leaf roof in a mosquito net. I’ll be getting up way early and be walking the flats well before sunrise. I’ll be feeling like a predator, a hunter, a man with a mission. And I’ll get to kill something big, I hope. A nice mamulla or even a king fish… on a fly line.

Can’t wait!

But for now… Stuck in Honiara. Grace is in Gizo. Will have the grandkids this weekend so it will be a bbq and pool this eve then a mass pass-out in front of the TV and a blisteringly early morning tomorrow…

Life is guuud…

Posted by: nativeiowan | March 23, 2011

’bout bloody time…

Former Israeli president Katsav jailed for rape

TEL AVIV: Former President Moshe Katsav was sentenced on Tuesday to seven years in jail for rape, a case that brought shame to Israel’s highest office and sent a firm message to a transfixed public that no one was above the law. Katsav had denied charges he twice raped an aide when he was a cabinet minister in the late 1990s, and molested or sexually harassed two other women who worked for him during his 2000-2007 term as president. But a three-judge panel said on convicting him in December on what Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu described as “a sad day for Israel and its residents”—that his testimony had been “riddled with lies.” “When a woman says no, she means no,” the panel said in its ruling. Katsav, 65, was also convicted of obstructing justice, for trying to confer with one complainant about her testimony to police. Netanyahu said at the time the verdict showed that “all are equal before the law”. Rape carries a minimum prison term of four years and a maximum of 16 years in Israel. Though the scandal had forced Katsav’s early retirement in disgrace, it had little impact on Israeli government functions, as the presidency is largely ceremonial. reuters

Posted by: nativeiowan | March 22, 2011

The full discussion paper (number 17)

Brief-17-YTH-0311

Posted by: nativeiowan | March 22, 2011

Worth a read

YOUTHQUAKE: will Melanesian democracy be sunk by demography?

In its latest briefing paper, the Pacific Institute of Public Policy (PiPP) looks at the need for political reform to governing systems across Melanesia as its young population booms.

It asks a troubling question – will democracy be sunk by demography?

The Pacific in general, but Melanesia in particular faces a serious demographic challenge. More than half the population is under 24 and in broad terms, urban populations are doubling every 17 years while national populations are doubling every 30 years.

The combination of pressures on land, jobs, geopolitics and a failing Westminster system of government is creating anger and frustration with consequences for continuing democratic rule in the region.

As the Great Arab Revolt unfolds on the other side of the world, with young people at the heart of calls for democracy, Melanesia seems to be moving in the opposite direction – from democracy towards autocracy. Right now, the trend in Melanesia is moving more towards Frank’s Fiji than Julia’s Australia.

There is real danger that left unchecked, the rising tide of youth and other frustrated citizens will want autocracy rather than democracy if service delivery continues to fail and there are no options for regional labour migration.

PiPP suggests a need for new thinking is revitalising democracy and governing systems in the region and an urgent need to manage generational change.

The full discussion paper (number 17) is attached.

 

Posted by: nativeiowan | March 22, 2011

’bout bloody time

Click here to find out more!Libya: Colonel Gaddafi in hiding as escape options begin to disappear

by Martin Fricker, Daily Mirror 22/03/2011

Muammar Gaddafi (pic: Reuters)

COLONEL Gaddafi was last night thought to be hiding in a secret underground bunker – guarded by a 40-strong squad of gun-toting female virgin bodyguards.

The tyrant has not been seen in public since the first allied blitz on Saturday and UK Special Forces sources believe he has fled to Sabha, a desert city of 130,000 people all fiercely loyal to their leader.

As well as his famous female minders – who wear make-up and high-heels – Gaddafi is understood to have surrounded himself with blood-thirsty mercenaries from Chad, Niger and Eastern Europe to give him round-the-clock protection.

But Western governments believe he will quit the country once it becomes clear his days are numbered.

If he does publicly flee or is killed, it is hoped residents in Tripoli and other western Libyan cities will be free to rise up against his brutal regime.

Locals are currently too ­terrified to show their true feelings, fearing the despot may one day return.

DEATH

Publicly Gaddafi says he will fight to the death, but diplomats say this is extremely unlikely.

Instead it is thought he will go to a “friendly” country such as Zimbabwe, where Robert Mugabe has said he will be welcome. Other possible destinations include Hugo Chavez’s Venezuela and African nations Chad and Niger.

It was for this reason that Western jets bombed an airfield close to the Libyan border in the opening salvo. It was used by private jets belonging to the Gaddafi family and would have been ideal for him to make his escape. Instead it is now partially destroyed thanks to laser-guided bombs from French and British jets.

Gaddafi went to ground shortly before air strikes were carried out on key targets and resorted to speaking on state TV by telephone over the weekend rather than appearing on camera.

Experts said he probably took the decision in case his appearance gave a clue to his exact whereabouts. He is thought to have fled Tripoli to escape the aerial bombardment from allied fighter jets. But a number of Gaddafi’s sons have remained to help with logistics. They included Khamis, 32, who reportedly died from severe burns after his father’s main Bab al-Azizia base was pounded. His older brother Saif al-Islam, 38, is still believed to be in the capital.

He claims to be head of the “modernising wing” of the family and regularly appears on TV.

Saif has travelled widely and wrote his PhD thesis at the London School of Economics on the role of civil society in democratisation.

Saadi Gaddafi, 37, is a former professional footballer in Malta and Italy, but is now head of the Libyan special forces. Mutassim Gaddafi, 33, is possibly the most powerful of the four siblings, holding the position of National Security Adviser.

 

 

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »

Categories